Post Info TOPIC: Walter Reed and the treatment of our Vets
Anonymous

Date:
Walter Reed and the treatment of our Vets


Another black eye for this "Freak Show" we call and an administration. Also, notice that you don't hear any critical coverage of the Walter Reed cover-up on FOX News, the White House's fair and balanced political partner.



Soldiers, families, vets: It's not just Walter Reed

By Anne Hull and Dana Priest - The Washington Post


WASHINGTON — Ray Oliva went into the spare bedroom in his home in Kelseyville, Calif., to wrestle with his feelings. He didn't know a single soldier wounded in Iraq, but he felt as if he knew them all.

He worried about the wounded who were entering the world of military health care, which he knew all too well. His own VA clinic in Livermore was a mess. The gown he wore was torn. The wheelchairs were old and broken.

"It is just not Walter Reed," Oliva, 70, slowly tapped out on his keyboard at 4:23 in the afternoon Friday. "The VA hospitals are not good either except for the staff who work so hard. It brings tears to my eyes when I see my brothers and sisters having to deal with these conditions."

Oliva is but one voice in a vast outpouring of accounts filled with emotion and anger about the mistreatment of wounded outpatients at Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington, D.C.

Stories of neglect and substandard care have flooded in from soldiers, their family members, veterans, doctors and nurses working inside the system.

They describe depressing living conditions for outpatients at other military bases around the country. They tell stories — their own versions, not verified — of callous responses to combat stress and a system ill-equipped to handle a new generation of psychologically scarred vets.

The official reaction to the revelations at Walter Reed has been swift, exposing the potential political costs of ignoring Oliva's 24.3 million comrades — America's veterans — many of whom are among the last standing supporters of the Iraq war.

In just two weeks, the Army secretary has been fired, a two-star general relieved of command and two special commissions appointed. Congressional subcommittees are lining up for hearings, the first one today at Walter Reed. And the president, in his weekly radio address, redoubled promises to do right by the all-volunteer force, 1.5 million of whom have fought in Iraq and Afghanistan.

But much deeper has been the reaction outside Washington, including from many of the 600,000 new veterans who left the service after Iraq and Afghanistan.

Wrenching questions have dominated blogs, talk shows, editorial cartoons, VFW spaghetti suppers and the solitary late nights of soldiers and former soldiers who fire off e-mails to reporters, members of Congress and the White House — looking, finally, for attention and solutions.

Several forces converged to create this intense reaction.

A new Democratic majority in Congress is willing to criticize the administration. Senior retired officers pounded the Pentagon with sharp questions. Up to 40 percent of the troops fighting in Iraq are National Guard members and reservists — "our neighbors," said Dr. Ron Glasser, a physician and author of a book about the wounded. "It all adds up and reaches a kind of tipping point," he said.

COUNTRY "EMBARRASSED"

On top of all that, America had believed the government's assurances that the wounded were being taken care of. "The country is embarrassed" to know otherwise, Glasser said.

Across the country, some military quarters for wounded outpatients are in bad shape, according to interviews, Government Accountability Office reports and congressional testimony.

The mold, mice and rot of Walter Reed's Building 18 compose a familiar scenario to many soldiers back from Iraq or Afghanistan who were shipped to their home posts for treatment. Nearly 4,000 outpatients are in the military's Medical Hold or Medical Holdover companies, which oversee the wounded.

Soldiers report bureaucratic disarray similar to Walter Reed's: indifferent, untrained staff; lost paperwork; medical appointments that drop from the computers; and long waits for consultations.

Sandy Karen was horrified when her 21-year-old son was discharged from the Naval Medical Center in San Diego a few months ago and told to report to the outpatient barracks, only to find the room swarming with fruit flies, trash overflowing and a syringe on the table.

"The staff sergeant says, 'Here are your linens' to my son, who can't even stand up," said Karen, of Brookeville, Md. "This kid has an open wound, and I'm gonna put him in a room with fruit flies?" She took her son to a hotel instead.

"My concern is for the others, who don't have a parent or someone to fight for them," she said. "These are just kids. Who would have ever looked in on my son?"

Capt. Leslie Haines was sent to Fort Knox, Ky., in 2004 after being flown out of Iraq. "The living conditions were the worst I'd ever seen for soldiers," he said. "Paint peeling, mold, windows that didn't work. I went to the hospital chaplain to get them to issue blankets and linens. There were no nurses. You had wounded and injured leading the troops."

Hundreds of soldiers contacted The Washington Post through telephone calls and e-mails, many of them describing their bleak existence in Med Hold.

• From Fort Campbell. Ky.: "There were yellow signs on the door stating our barracks had asbestos."

• From Fort Dix, N.J.: "Scare tactics are used against soldiers who will write sworn statement to assist fellow soldiers for their medical needs."

• From Fort Irwin, Calif.: "Most of us have had to sign waivers where we understand that the housing we were in failed to meet minimal government standards."

TIP OF THE ICEBERG

Soldiers back from Iraq worry that their psychological problems are only beginning to surface. "The hammer is just coming down, I can feel it," said retired Maj. Anthony DeStefano of New Jersey, describing his descent into post-traumatic stress and the Army's propensity to medicate rather than talk.

When he returned home, Army doctors put him on the antipsychotic drug Seroquel. "That way, you can screw their lights out and they won't feel a thing," he said of patients like himself. "By the time they understand what is going on, they are through the board and stuck with an unfavorable percentage of disability."

Nearly 64,000 of the more than 184,000 Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans who have sought VA health care have been diagnosed with potential symptoms of post-traumatic stress, drug abuse or other mental disorders as of the end of June, according to the latest report by the Veterans Health Administration. Of those, nearly 30,000 had possible post-traumatic stress disorder, the report said.

VA hospitals are also receiving a surge of new patients. At the sprawling James J. Peters VA Medical Center in the Bronx, N.Y., Spec. Roberto Reyes Jr., 23, lies nearly immobile and unable to talk.

Once a strapping member of Charlie Company, 1st Battalion, 5th Cavalry, he got too close to an improvised explosive device in Iraq and was sent to Walter Reed, where doctors did all they could before shipping him to the VA for the remainder of his life.

A cloudy bag of urine hangs from his wheelchair. His mother and his aunt are constant bedside companions; Reyes likes for them to get two inches from his face, so he can pull on their noses with the few fingers he can still control.

Maria Mendez, his aunt, complained about the staff. "They fight over who's going to have to give him a bath — in front of him!" Mendez said. Reyes suffered third-degree burns on his leg when a nurse left him in a shower unattended. His aunt found out only when she saw the burns.

Among the most aggrieved are veterans who have lived with the open secret of substandard, underfunded care in 158 VA hospitals and hundreds of health centers. They vented their fury in thousands of e-mails and phone calls and in chat rooms.

"I have been trying to get someone, ANYBODY, to look into my allegations" at the Dayton VA, Darrell Hampton pleaded.

"I'm calling from Summerville, South Carolina, and I have a story to tell," began Horace Williams, 62. "I'm a Marine from the Vietnam era, and it took me 20 years to get the benefits I was entitled to."

TRAUMA RESURFACES

The VA has a backlog of 400,000 benefit claims, including many about mental health. Vietnam vets whose post-traumatic stress has been triggered by images from Iraq seek help and are being turned away.

For years, politicians' mailboxes have overflowed with letters from veterans complaining of bad care across the country. Last week, Walter Reed was besieged by members of Congress who toured the hospital and Building 18 to gain firsthand knowledge of the conditions.

Many of them have been visiting patients in the hospital for years, but now they are issuing news releases decrying the mistreatment of the wounded.

Sgt. William A. Jones recently wrote to his Arizona senators complaining about abuse at the VA hospital in Phoenix. He had written to the president before that. "Not one person has taken the time to respond in any manner," Jones said in an e-mail.

From Ray Oliva, the distraught 70-year-old vet from Kelseyville, Ca., came this: "I wrote a letter to Senators Feinstein and Boxer a few years ago asking why I had to wear Hospital gowns that had holes in them and torn and why some of the Vets had to ask for beds that had good mattress instead of broken and old. Wheelchairs old and tired and the list goes on and on. I never did get a response."

Oliva lives in a house on a tranquil lake. His hands were burned and his hearing shot from working on fighter jets on the flight line. "Gun plumbers," as they called themselves, didn't get earplugs in the late 1950s, when Oliva was in the Air Force. All minor compared with what he later saw at the VA clinic where he received care.

"I sat with guys who'd served in 'Nam," Oliva said. "We had terrible problems with the VA. But we were all so powerless to do anything about them. Just like Walter Reed."

Copyright © 2007 The Seattle Times Company


__________________
Anonymous

Date:

The Bush-Cheney crowd talk a lot about supporting our troops, but in reality they don't give a hoot about the men and women they have put in jeopardy in a war that has been going on several thousand years.

Our men and women are in the middle of a religious civil war in a country where there has never been any leader who cared about the people of Iraq. Before we ever place any of our troops in harms way we had better use good common sense to determine if what we are doing is right, if we have the equipment to protect our troops in the best way possible, if we have enough troops to get the job done, and if we have an exit plan. When we went into Iraq and wanted the people to have the right to vote we automatically made it possible for Iran to have more influence in Iraq. These long time enemies are now being drawn together by the Shiite leaders in both countries.

God bless our brave men and women who have been sent into a mess. It was chaos when we went in, it is chaos now, and it will be chaos when we leave. I would not shed one more US death or injury in that part of the world because they don't want us there, and we have no business getting into the middle of their long historic hate and murderous conduct.

__________________
Anonymous

Date:

Are you kidding? FOX News is the only channel that doesn't make republicans look like retards. O'Rielly is awesome.

__________________
Anonymous

Date:

The Bush-Cheney Legacy

1. We went from a budget surplus to deficit
2. We had the world on our side after 9/11 and now the world is against us.
3. We were one of only a few nations that did not accept that Global Warming was a problem.
4. We disavowed the Geneva Accords and used torture.
5. We gave Haliburton non-bid contracts with which they cheated and over charged us.
6. Tom Delay and Abramson came up with fund raising schemes that forced Delay to resign and have sent Abrahamson to prison.
7. Congressman Cunningham took kickbacks from defense contractors to the tune of over $2 Million dollars. He is in prison.
8. The White House staff released the identity of a CIA agent which is against the law. Scooter Libby is on trial for this offense.
9. Sec. of Defense Rumsfeld was a disaster who did not provide our military leaders enough troops, protective equipment, and an Exit Strategy.
10. Walter Reed Hospital has some of its facility which is a rat infested mess.
11. FEMA response to KATRINA was another disaster.
12. We have stretched so thin our reserves and national guard troops and many have had to serve several tours of duty in the Middle East.
13. In six years our citizens without Medical Insurance have gone from 40 Million in 2000 to 50 Million in 2007.
14. We have cut taxes for our most wealthy citizens and at the same time sent our brave men and women to war.
15. Nearly all the coalition casualties in Iraq are US military because most of the coalition troops from other countries have pulled out of Iraq.
16. We never found any WMD in Iraq.
17. We sent so much of our military to Iraq ,and now Afghanistan is becoming a serious problem.

If we studied some more we would come up with more.

__________________
Anonymous

Date:

It is sad to see those who risk their lives and limbs for our Country treated like many of them are when they come home to heal up. It is also sad to see many of those wounded and courageous have to go back to harm's way three and four times.

The leaders of the nation's of the world have an opportunity to put an end to war if they were not so selfish. Let's pray that they will change from hate, and murder, and lust of power, and the grasp of more power, and somehow realize it is in their hands to bring peace to the world. Our God would rejoice if His children showed Him we were trying to be more like him.

__________________
Anonymous

Date:

Old Dad, you sound very sincere about your love and respect for individual rights. I admire your honesty and opinions. I may disagree with you but that is what is good about our country and our area. People are not afraid to speak up. That is another thing I like about this forum. It gives us a chance to hear other people's views and look at issues from both sides. Good luck to you, Old Dad.

__________________
Anonymous

Date:

It is good to see President Bush visit Walter Reed Hospital today and apologize to our nation and
courageous troops for the poor service some have received as they recover from their wounds.

It seems that just about everything in the Bush Administration has to be apologized for because it has screwed up so much.

__________________
Anonymous

Date:




Bush ex-strategist says loses faith in president

Sun Apr 1, 2007 10:03AM EDT
By Randall Mikkelsen

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The chief strategist of U.S. President George W. Bush's 2004 re-election campaign said he had lost faith in the president over Iraq and other issues, in one of the highest-level ruptures of Bush's inner circle.

Matthew Dowd, a polling expert who switched parties to become a Republican and served as a senior strategist in Bush's 2000 presidential campaign, told The New York Times in an interview on Sunday that Bush must face up to Americans' growing disillusionment with the war.

Dowd said he had found himself agreeing with calls by Democratic Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts, Bush's opponent in 2004, for a withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq.

"If the American public says they're done with something, our leaders have to understand what they want," Dowd said. "They're saying, 'Get out of Iraq.'"

He also cited the administration's bungled handling of the response to Hurricane Katrina in 2005 and Bush's refusal to meet Cindy Sheehan, who had lost a son in Iraq and led a protest outside Bush's Texas ranch.

"I had finally come to the conclusion that maybe all these things along do add up," Dowd said. "That it's not the same, it's not the person I thought."

Although some other administration officials have expressed similar views over the years, the Times said Dowd is the first member of Bush's famously loyal inner circle to break so publicly with him.

Dowd said he had been attracted to Bush by his ability as Texas governor to work across party lines but Bush had failed to do the same as president and had become isolated with his views hardening.

"I really like him, which is why I'm so disappointed in things," Dowd said. "I think he's become more, in my view, secluded and bubbled in."

He said Bush had failed to call for a shared sacrifice among Americans after the September 11 attacks and followed a divisive political strategy.

Dowd helped develop Bush's successful re-election strategy of appealing to his Republican "base" but sounded a different note in the Times interview.

"I think we should design campaigns that appeal not to 51 percent of the people," he said, "but to bring the country together as a whole."

The Times quoted White House counselor Dan Bartlett as saying he disagreed with Dowd's views on Bush but that the criticism reflects the U.S. debate over the war.

"Even people that supported the president aren't immune from having their own feelings and emotions," Bartlett said.

The Times said Dowd acknowledged that the expected deployment to Iraq of his oldest son, Daniel, an Army intelligence specialist, was a factor in his changed view of Bush.

Dowd said he now wanted to "do my part in fixing fissures that I may have been a part of."

The Times said Dowd cited Democratic Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois as the only 2008 presidential candidate who appeals to him but said the idea of mission work also was attractive as a way to "re-establish a level of gentleness in the world."


__________________
Anonymous

Date:

jitcrunch.aspx?bG9hZD1ibGFuayxibGFuazozX0ZfbzEuanBnfGxvYWQ9TDAsaHR0cDovL2ltYWdlcy5jYWZlcHJlc3MuY29tL2ltYWdlLzgyNjEyMjFfNDAweDQwMC5qcGd8fHNjYWxlPUwwLDQxOCwzNTIsV2hpdGV8Y29tcG9zZT1ibGFuayxMMCxBZGQsMzEsNjl8bG9hZD1tYXNrLGJsYW5rOjNfRl9tYXNrX28xLmpwZ3xjb21wb3NlPWJsYW5rLG1hc2ssTWFzaywwLDB8Y3A9cmVzdWx0LGJsYW5rfHNjYWxlPXJlc3VsdCwwLDQ4MCxXaGl0ZXxjb21wcmVzc2lvbj05NXw=

__________________
Anonymous

Date:

EDITORIAL: A Presidential Cell Game: President Bush Sought to Hide His Stem-Cell Veto Under a Meaningless Research Directive.

By The Roanoke Times, Va.

Jun. 24--President Bush deferred the hopes of the incurably sick and disabled Wednesday when, for the second time, he vetoed a bill that would have expanded federal funding of embryonic
stem cell research.

He added insult to injury by then issuing an executive order that is nothing but a public relations ruse, an attempt to neutralize the political impact of an unpopular decision.
 
Close on the heels of his veto, the president ordered the Department of Health and Human Services to promote research into cells other than those from human embryos that might contain their same potential to regenerate into different types of cells.
 
Research on nonembryonic stem cells faces no federal funding restrictions, however, and needs no special presidential directive to go forward.
 
It is valuable work, and the researchers doing it already can pursue federal funding based on the strength of their science and, of course, the availability of money. Bush's order provides no more of that.

Only embryonic stem cell research -- the research that still offers the most hope against paralysis and diseases such as Parkinson's and Alzheimer's -- is being slowed by funding restrictions that Bush ordered in 2001.
 
He wanted then, as he does today, to satisfy his conservative religious political base, which regards each embryo as a human life to be protected. Yet he also sought then, as he does today, to mollify the majority of Americans who want this research. Embryonic stem cells have the potential to develop into any type of cell or tissue in the body, and offer hope for great medical advances.
 
The 2001 rules restricted federal tax-supported research to existing embryonic stem cell lines. The billBush vetoed last week would have allowed scientists to work with fresh colonies of cells taken from donated, surplus embryos that are slated to be destroyed by fertility clinics.
 
They might, instead, be used to help people living with dread diseases and without hope -- if the majority of Americans who favor this research elect a like-minded president next year.



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us
Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard